09.01.2015 Views

small area ranking_2000_by province - NSCB

small area ranking_2000_by province - NSCB

small area ranking_2000_by province - NSCB

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Table 1. RANKING OF MUNICIPALITIES/CITIES BY POVERTY INCIDENCE<br />

REGION VIII: <strong>2000</strong><br />

RANK<br />

(Poorest=1)<br />

MUNICIPALITY<br />

PROVINCE<br />

POVERTY<br />

INCIDENCE<br />

(In Percent)<br />

1 MATUGUINAO SAMAR 72.16<br />

2 DARAM SAMAR 71.05<br />

3 ZUMARRAGA SAMAR 68.60<br />

4 SILVINO LOBOS NORTHERN SAMAR 67.93<br />

5 SAN JOSE DE BUAN SAMAR 65.67<br />

6 JIPAPAD EASTERN SAMAR 65.59<br />

7 LAS NAVAS NORTHERN SAMAR 65.36<br />

8 LEYTE LEYTE 64.85<br />

9 GANDARA SAMAR 64.51<br />

10 TARANGNAN SAMAR 64.28<br />

11 MASLOG EASTERN SAMAR 64.04<br />

12 MAPANAS NORTHERN SAMAR 63.98<br />

13 SAN ISIDRO LEYTE 63.19<br />

14 LAPINIG NORTHERN SAMAR 62.60<br />

15 SANTA RITA SAMAR 62.57<br />

16 CATUBIG NORTHERN SAMAR 62.18<br />

17 PASTRANA LEYTE 62.14<br />

18 LOPE DE VEGA NORTHERN SAMAR 61.23<br />

19 PAMBUJAN NORTHERN SAMAR 60.92<br />

20 TAGAPUL-AN SAMAR 60.87<br />

21 MOTIONG SAMAR 60.26<br />

22 PALAPAG NORTHERN SAMAR 60.13<br />

23 SAN JORGE SAMAR 59.99<br />

24 TABANGO LEYTE 59.13<br />

25 PINABACDAO SAMAR 58.60<br />

26 SAN ROQUE NORTHERN SAMAR 58.25<br />

27 TALALORA SAMAR 57.91<br />

28 CALBIGA SAMAR 57.88<br />

29 MONDRAGON NORTHERN SAMAR 57.52<br />

30 VILLAREAL SAMAR 57.29<br />

31 JIABONG SAMAR 57.19<br />

32 SANTO NIÑO SAMAR 57.18<br />

33 BATO LEYTE 56.80<br />

34 GENERAL MACARTHUR EASTERN SAMAR 56.54<br />

35 SAN SEBASTIAN SAMAR 56.32<br />

36 CAPOOCAN LEYTE 55.65<br />

37 CABUCGAYAN BILIRAN 55.52<br />

38 CALUBIAN LEYTE 55.39<br />

39 LAVEZARES NORTHERN SAMAR 55.31<br />

40 LAOANG NORTHERN SAMAR 55.03<br />

41 CAIBIRAN BILIRAN 54.90<br />

42 ARTECHE EASTERN SAMAR 54.70<br />

43 BIRI NORTHERN SAMAR 54.53<br />

44 HERNANI EASTERN SAMAR 54.50<br />

45 MATAG-OB LEYTE 53.70<br />

46 GIPORLOS EASTERN SAMAR 53.33<br />

47 TABONTABON LEYTE 53.28<br />

48 GAMAY NORTHERN SAMAR 53.22<br />

49 MATALOM LEYTE 52.93<br />

50 ALMAGRO SAMAR 52.58


RANK<br />

(Poorest=1)<br />

MUNICIPALITY<br />

PROVINCE<br />

POVERTY<br />

INCIDENCE<br />

(In Percent)<br />

51 PAGSANGHAN SAMAR 52.32<br />

52 BABATNGON LEYTE 52.04<br />

53 HILONGOS LEYTE 51.69<br />

54 VILLABA LEYTE 51.60<br />

55 SANTA MARGARITA SAMAR 51.53<br />

56 KANANGA LEYTE 51.49<br />

57 QUINAPONDAN EASTERN SAMAR 51.47<br />

58 ROSARIO NORTHERN SAMAR 50.35<br />

59 SALCEDO EASTERN SAMAR 50.25<br />

60 SAN MIGUEL LEYTE 50.24<br />

61 MAYORGA LEYTE 50.21<br />

62 MARABUT SAMAR 50.15<br />

63 BASEY SAMAR 50.05<br />

64 JAVIER (BUGHO) LEYTE 49.79<br />

65 SANTA FE LEYTE 49.68<br />

66 MAHAPLAG LEYTE 48.99<br />

67 SAN RICARDO SOUTHERN LEYTE 48.98<br />

68 MARIPIPI BILIRAN 48.31<br />

69 JULITA LEYTE 48.01<br />

70 BARUGO LEYTE 47.88<br />

71 DOLORES EASTERN SAMAR 47.87<br />

72 SAN VICENTE NORTHERN SAMAR 47.77<br />

73 SAN POLICARPO EASTERN SAMAR 47.69<br />

74 PARANAS (WRIGHT) SAMAR 47.55<br />

75 MAYDOLONG EASTERN SAMAR 47.45<br />

76 LLORENTE EASTERN SAMAR 47.39<br />

77 BONTOC SOUTHERN LEYTE 47.10<br />

78 SAN JOSE NORTHERN SAMAR 47.08<br />

79 BALANGIGA EASTERN SAMAR 46.90<br />

80 CAPUL NORTHERN SAMAR 46.85<br />

81 CULABA BILIRAN 46.66<br />

82 DAGAMI LEYTE 46.63<br />

83 BOBON NORTHERN SAMAR 45.97<br />

84 ALANGALANG LEYTE 45.80<br />

85 ORAS EASTERN SAMAR 45.66<br />

86 DULAG LEYTE 45.57<br />

87 HINABANGAN SAMAR 45.46<br />

88 JARO LEYTE 45.31<br />

89 MACARTHUR LEYTE 44.95<br />

90 SAN JULIAN EASTERN SAMAR 44.67<br />

91 CAN-AVID EASTERN SAMAR 44.48<br />

92 LA PAZ LEYTE 44.28<br />

93 SAN ANTONIO NORTHERN SAMAR 44.12<br />

94 ALBUERA LEYTE 44.10<br />

95 BALANGKAYAN EASTERN SAMAR 44.06<br />

96 CARIGARA LEYTE 43.75<br />

97 CALBAYOG CITY SAMAR 43.70<br />

98 BILIRAN BILIRAN 43.03<br />

99 ABUYOG LEYTE 42.60<br />

100 MALITBOG SOUTHERN LEYTE 42.26


RANK<br />

(Poorest=1)<br />

MUNICIPALITY<br />

PROVINCE<br />

POVERTY<br />

INCIDENCE<br />

(In Percent)<br />

101 KAWAYAN BILIRAN 42.04<br />

102 HINDANG LEYTE 42.00<br />

103 GUIUAN EASTERN SAMAR 41.96<br />

104 VICTORIA NORTHERN SAMAR 41.92<br />

105 BURAUEN LEYTE 41.71<br />

106 TOMAS OPPUS SOUTHERN LEYTE 41.56<br />

107 SAINT BERNARD SOUTHERN LEYTE 41.40<br />

108 SOGOD SOUTHERN LEYTE 41.07<br />

109 NAVAL (Capital) BILIRAN 40.83<br />

110 SAN ISIDRO NORTHERN SAMAR 40.22<br />

111 TAFT EASTERN SAMAR 39.86<br />

112 LIBAGON SOUTHERN LEYTE 39.72<br />

113 INOPACAN LEYTE 38.86<br />

114 MERIDA LEYTE 38.80<br />

115 TANAUAN LEYTE 38.66<br />

116 PINTUYAN SOUTHERN LEYTE 38.24<br />

117 PALOMPON LEYTE 38.14<br />

118 LILOAN SOUTHERN LEYTE 38.05<br />

119 CATARMAN (Capital) NORTHERN SAMAR 37.92<br />

120 ALLEN NORTHERN SAMAR 37.75<br />

121 MERCEDES EASTERN SAMAR 36.38<br />

122 LAWAAN EASTERN SAMAR 36.32<br />

123 SAN FRANCISCO SOUTHERN LEYTE 36.11<br />

124 BAYBAY LEYTE 35.83<br />

125 CATBALOGAN (Capital) SAMAR 35.75<br />

126 SILAGO SOUTHERN LEYTE 35.25<br />

127 HINUNANGAN SOUTHERN LEYTE 35.15<br />

128 SAN JUAN (CABALIAN) SOUTHERN LEYTE 35.13<br />

129 ALMERIA BILIRAN 34.93<br />

130 LIMASAWA SOUTHERN LEYTE 34.82<br />

131 ORMOC CITY LEYTE 34.35<br />

132 MACROHON SOUTHERN LEYTE 33.18<br />

133 SULAT EASTERN SAMAR 32.06<br />

134 ANAHAWAN SOUTHERN LEYTE 31.54<br />

135 MAASIN CITY (Capital) SOUTHERN LEYTE 30.52<br />

136 HINUNDAYAN SOUTHERN LEYTE 30.02<br />

137 TOLOSA LEYTE 28.74<br />

138 ISABEL LEYTE 27.81<br />

139 BORONGAN (Capital) EASTERN SAMAR 27.58<br />

140 PALO LEYTE 27.41<br />

141 TUNGA LEYTE 26.33<br />

142 PADRE BURGOS SOUTHERN LEYTE 24.62<br />

143 TACLOBAN CITY (Capital) LEYTE 9.85<br />

Notes: 1. Poverty incidence is the proportion of poor population to total population.<br />

2. The methodology employed to generate poverty incidence was <strong>small</strong>-<strong>area</strong> estimation using<br />

the data of the <strong>2000</strong> Family Income and Expenditure Survey (FIES), <strong>2000</strong> Labor Force Survey (LFS)<br />

and <strong>2000</strong> Census of Population and Housing.<br />

Source: Based on the Poverty Mapping Project implemented <strong>by</strong> the National Statistical Coordination Board<br />

with funding assistance from the World Bank - Asia Europe Meeting (WB-ASEM) Trust Fund


Table 2. RANKING OF MUNICIPALITIES BY POVERTY INCIDENCE<br />

LEYTE: <strong>2000</strong><br />

RANK<br />

(Poorest=1)<br />

MUNICIPALITY<br />

POVERTY INCIDENCE<br />

(In Percent)<br />

1 LEYTE 64.85<br />

2 SAN ISIDRO 63.19<br />

3 PASTRANA 62.14<br />

4 TABANGO 59.13<br />

5 BATO 56.80<br />

6 CAPOOCAN 55.65<br />

7 CALUBIAN 55.39<br />

8 MATAG-OB 53.70<br />

9 TABONTABON 53.28<br />

10 MATALOM 52.93<br />

11 BABATNGON 52.04<br />

12 HILONGOS 51.69<br />

13 VILLABA 51.60<br />

14 KANANGA 51.49<br />

15 SAN MIGUEL 50.24<br />

16 MAYORGA 50.21<br />

17 JAVIER (BUGHO) 49.79<br />

18 SANTA FE 49.68<br />

19 MAHAPLAG 48.99<br />

20 JULITA 48.01<br />

21 BARUGO 47.88<br />

22 DAGAMI 46.63<br />

23 ALANGALANG 45.80<br />

24 DULAG 45.57<br />

25 JARO 45.31<br />

26 MACARTHUR 44.95<br />

27 LA PAZ 44.28<br />

28 ALBUERA 44.10<br />

29 CARIGARA 43.75<br />

30 ABUYOG 42.60<br />

31 HINDANG 42.00<br />

32 BURAUEN 41.71<br />

33 INOPACAN 38.86<br />

34 MERIDA 38.80<br />

35 TANAUAN 38.66<br />

36 PALOMPON 38.14<br />

37 BAYBAY 35.83<br />

38 ORMOC CITY 34.35<br />

39 TOLOSA 28.74<br />

40 ISABEL 27.81<br />

41 PALO 27.41<br />

42 TUNGA 26.33<br />

43 TACLOBAN CITY (Capital) 9.85<br />

Notes: 1. Poverty incidence is the proportion of poor population to total population.<br />

2. The methodology employed to generate poverty incidence was <strong>small</strong>-<strong>area</strong> estimation<br />

using the data of the <strong>2000</strong> Family Income and Expenditure Survey (FIES), <strong>2000</strong> Labor<br />

Force Survey (LFS) and <strong>2000</strong> Census of Population and Housing.<br />

Source: National Statistical Coordination Board


Table 3. RANKING OF MUNICIPALITIES BY POVERTY INCIDENCE<br />

BILIRAN: <strong>2000</strong><br />

RANK<br />

(Poorest=1)<br />

MUNICIPALITY<br />

POVERTY INCIDENCE<br />

(In Percent)<br />

1 CABUCGAYAN 55.52<br />

2 CAIBIRAN 54.90<br />

3 MARIPIPI 48.31<br />

4 CULABA 46.66<br />

5 BILIRAN 43.03<br />

6 KAWAYAN 42.04<br />

7 NAVAL (Capital) 40.83<br />

8 ALMERIA 34.93<br />

Notes: 1. Poverty incidence is the proportion of poor population to total population.<br />

2. The methodology employed to generate poverty incidence was <strong>small</strong>-<strong>area</strong> estimation<br />

using the data of the <strong>2000</strong> Family Income and Expenditure Survey (FIES), <strong>2000</strong> Labor<br />

Force Survey (LFS) and <strong>2000</strong> Census of Population and Housing.<br />

Source: National Statistical Coordination Board


Table 4. RANKING OF MUNICIPALITIES BY POVERTY INCIDENCE<br />

SOUTHERN LEYTE: <strong>2000</strong><br />

RANK<br />

(Poorest=1)<br />

MUNICIPALITY<br />

POVERTY INCIDENCE<br />

(In Percent)<br />

1 SAN RICARDO 48.98<br />

2 BONTOC 47.10<br />

3 MALITBOG 42.26<br />

4 TOMAS OPPUS 41.56<br />

5 SAINT BERNARD 41.40<br />

6 SOGOD 41.07<br />

7 LIBAGON 39.72<br />

8 PINTUYAN 38.24<br />

9 LILOAN 38.05<br />

10 SAN FRANCISCO 36.11<br />

11 SILAGO 35.25<br />

12 HINUNANGAN 35.15<br />

13 SAN JUAN (CABALIAN) 35.13<br />

14 LIMASAWA 34.82<br />

15 MACROHON 33.18<br />

16 ANAHAWAN 31.54<br />

17 MAASIN CITY (Capital) 30.52<br />

18 HINUNDAYAN 30.02<br />

19 PADRE BURGOS 24.62<br />

Notes: 1. Poverty incidence is the proportion of poor population to total population.<br />

2. The methodology employed to generate poverty incidence was <strong>small</strong>-<strong>area</strong> estimation<br />

using the data of the <strong>2000</strong> Family Income and Expenditure Survey (FIES), <strong>2000</strong> Labor<br />

Force Survey (LFS) and <strong>2000</strong> Census of Population and Housing.<br />

Source: National Statistical Coordination Board


Table 5. RANKING OF MUNICIPALITIES BY POVERTY INCIDENCE<br />

SAMAR: <strong>2000</strong><br />

RANK<br />

(Poorest=1)<br />

MUNICIPALITY<br />

POVERTY INCIDENCE<br />

(In Percent)<br />

1 MATUGUINAO 72.16<br />

2 DARAM 71.05<br />

3 ZUMARRAGA 68.60<br />

4 SAN JOSE DE BUAN 65.67<br />

5 GANDARA 64.51<br />

6 TARANGNAN 64.28<br />

7 SANTA RITA 62.57<br />

8 TAGAPUL-AN 60.87<br />

9 MOTIONG 60.26<br />

10 SAN JORGE 59.99<br />

11 PINABACDAO 58.60<br />

12 TALALORA 57.91<br />

13 CALBIGA 57.88<br />

14 VILLAREAL 57.29<br />

15 JIABONG 57.19<br />

16 SANTO NIÑO 57.18<br />

17 SAN SEBASTIAN 56.32<br />

18 ALMAGRO 52.58<br />

19 PAGSANGHAN 52.32<br />

20 SANTA MARGARITA 51.53<br />

21 MARABUT 50.15<br />

22 BASEY 50.05<br />

23 PARANAS (WRIGHT) 47.55<br />

24 HINABANGAN 45.46<br />

25 CALBAYOG CITY 43.70<br />

26 CATBALOGAN (Capital) 35.75<br />

Notes: 1. Poverty incidence is the proportion of poor population to total population.<br />

2. The methodology employed to generate poverty incidence was <strong>small</strong>-<strong>area</strong> estimation<br />

using the data of the <strong>2000</strong> Family Income and Expenditure Survey (FIES), <strong>2000</strong> Labor<br />

Force Survey (LFS) and <strong>2000</strong> Census of Population and Housing.<br />

Source: National Statistical Coordination Board


Table 6. RANKING OF MUNICIPALITIES BY POVERTY INCIDENCE<br />

EASTERN SAMAR: <strong>2000</strong><br />

RANK<br />

(Poorest=1)<br />

MUNICIPALITY<br />

POVERTY INCIDENCE<br />

(In Percent)<br />

1 JIPAPAD 65.59<br />

2 MASLOG 64.04<br />

3 GENERAL MACARTHUR 56.54<br />

4 ARTECHE 54.70<br />

5 HERNANI 54.50<br />

6 GIPORLOS 53.33<br />

7 QUINAPONDAN 51.47<br />

8 SALCEDO 50.25<br />

9 DOLORES 47.87<br />

10 SAN POLICARPO 47.69<br />

11 MAYDOLONG 47.45<br />

12 LLORENTE 47.39<br />

13 BALANGIGA 46.90<br />

14 ORAS 45.66<br />

15 SAN JULIAN 44.67<br />

16 CAN-AVID 44.48<br />

17 BALANGKAYAN 44.06<br />

18 GUIUAN 41.96<br />

19 TAFT 39.86<br />

20 MERCEDES 36.38<br />

21 LAWAAN 36.32<br />

22 SULAT 32.06<br />

23 BORONGAN (Capital) 27.58<br />

Notes: 1. Poverty incidence is the proportion of poor population to total population.<br />

2. The methodology employed to generate poverty incidence was <strong>small</strong>-<strong>area</strong> estimation<br />

using the data of the <strong>2000</strong> Family Income and Expenditure Survey (FIES), <strong>2000</strong> Labor<br />

Force Survey (LFS) and <strong>2000</strong> Census of Population and Housing.<br />

Source: National Statistical Coordination Board


Table 7. RANKING OF MUNICIPALITIES BY POVERTY INCIDENCE<br />

NORTHERN SAMAR: <strong>2000</strong><br />

RANK<br />

(Poorest=1)<br />

MUNICIPALITY<br />

POVERTY INCIDENCE<br />

(In Percent)<br />

1 SILVINO LOBOS 67.93<br />

2 LAS NAVAS 65.36<br />

3 MAPANAS 63.98<br />

4 LAPINIG 62.60<br />

5 CATUBIG 62.18<br />

6 LOPE DE VEGA 61.23<br />

7 PAMBUJAN 60.92<br />

8 PALAPAG 60.13<br />

9 SAN ROQUE 58.25<br />

10 MONDRAGON 57.52<br />

11 LAVEZARES 55.31<br />

12 LAOANG 55.03<br />

13 BIRI 54.53<br />

14 GAMAY 53.22<br />

15 ROSARIO 50.35<br />

16 SAN VICENTE 47.77<br />

17 SAN JOSE 47.08<br />

18 CAPUL 46.85<br />

19 BOBON 45.97<br />

20 SAN ANTONIO 44.12<br />

21 VICTORIA 41.92<br />

22 SAN ISIDRO 40.22<br />

23 CATARMAN (Capital) 37.92<br />

24 ALLEN 37.75<br />

Notes: 1. Poverty incidence is the proportion of poor population to total population.<br />

2. The methodology employed to generate poverty incidence was <strong>small</strong>-<strong>area</strong> estimation<br />

using the data of the <strong>2000</strong> Family Income and Expenditure Survey (FIES), <strong>2000</strong> Labor<br />

Force Survey (LFS) and <strong>2000</strong> Census of Population and Housing.<br />

Source: National Statistical Coordination Board

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!